Team Science – With a Twist
At TeamPath, we like our advice backed by evidence. But let’s be honest—academic research on teams can be a bit dry. So we’ve asked AI to turn top team science papers into podcast-style conversations.
The result? Something like John and Gail from Pitch Perfect—if they swapped a cappella commentary for team dynamics. John’s blunt and occasionally inappropriate. Gail’s sharp and slightly over it. Together, they break down the science so you don’t have to. It’s research, with a little banter.
Disclaimer: These episodes are AI-generated. While we aim for accuracy, the bots may occasionally go rogue.
Based on: “Reflexivity in Teams: A Review and New Perspectives” by Konradt, Otte, Schippers, & Steenfatt (2015)
Team reflexivity — the act of teams regularly reflecting on their goals, strategies, and processes — is a proven pathway to higher performance, especially in complex and changing environments. But not all reflection is created equal. This paper reframes how we think about team reflexivity, arguing that the depth, quality, and timing of team reflection can be the difference between innovative momentum and going in circles.
The paper brings together over a decade of team research and presents compelling evidence for how and when reflection improves team outcomes:
These studies support the idea that reflection isn’t just about talking — it leads to clearer strategies, stronger coordination, and better outcomes when it prompts real adaptation.
This paper marks a shift in how team scientists think about improvement. Reflexivity is no longer seen as a static trait — it's now understood as a dynamic, context-sensitive behavior.
For teams interested in continuous improvement and practical team building, this research offers clear and actionable insights:
Reflection is most effective during natural breaks between projects or sprints. Encourage teams to adopt regular “pause and reflect” sessions after key milestones.
Superficial check-ins won't cut it. Reflection needs to go beyond "what went well" to tackle "why did this work?", "what patterns are we seeing?", and "what could we change?"
Use visual aids, collaborative docs, or retrospectives to clarify assumptions. Effective teams align not just on goals, but on how to get there and who is doing what.
Negative feedback isn’t a threat — it’s an opportunity. Create psychologically safe spaces where teams can look at poor results as signals for needed change.
The most powerful team improvement ideas come from embedding reflection into daily behaviors. Short, guided reflection sessions can be as effective as formal training.
Reflexivity isn’t about stopping the work; it’s about making the work smarter. This paper adds strong academic weight to what many team leads have sensed: that high-performing teams make time to think, and then act on what they learn. By weaving reflection into the rhythm of teamwork, we can create more aligned, innovative, and resilient teams.
This podcast includes content generated with the help of artificial intelligence. While we've done our best to guide and review the conversation, there may be occasional errors or inaccuracies. Please listen with that in mind and always double-check any critical information. Thanks for your understanding!