Teams: The Complexity Busters of Organizations

When you invest in building strong teams, the benefits go far beyond boosting performance. The real magic lies in the ripple effect: greater innovation, stronger wellbeing, healthier cultures, more agile leadership, and truly accountable organizations. Every team you strengthen sends positive waves across your entire system.

One of the most profound ripples? Taming organizational complexity.

‍

Complexity: The New Normal

‍

Today’s organizations face a relentless storm: hybrid workforces, volatile markets, disruptive technologies, and ever-expanding regulations. Complexity isn’t a side effect — it’s the environment we operate in.

But here’s the paradox: you can’t manage complexity by adding more complexity. More rules, more processes, and more layers often make things worse.

The real antidote? Empowered, connected teams — equipped to think clearly, act decisively, and adapt in real time.

‍

Complexity and the Illusion of Central Control

‍

Complexity often grows from good intentions gone sideways.

The Project Management Institute (PMI) highlights how it’s rarely bad actors that create organizational bloat — it's the slow accumulation of policies and processes designed to manage uncertainty. Yang and Grenier’s 2024 study on administrative bloat shows how layering rules on top of outdated ones gradually paralyzes organizations.

At the heart of it lies a dangerous illusion: The belief that tighter central control can eliminate risk.

But decades of research paint a different picture:

• The Garbage Can Model (Cohen, March, and Olsen, 1972) described decision-making inside organizations as messy, chaotic, and unpredictable.
  
  
• Karl Weick’s Sensemaking Theory showed that people don't simply follow plans — they constantly interpret and adapt based on what's happening around them.
  
  
• Complexity Leadership Theory (Uhl-Bien et al.) emphasizes that in turbulent environments, leadership must be distributed, not hoarded at the top.
  
  

In short: Organizations perform better when the people closest to the work are trusted to sense, decide, and act. No amount of structure or hierarchy can fully tame the beautiful messiness of organizational life.

‍

The Rise — and Lessons — of Decentralized Teams

‍

Empowering teams to make local decisions isn't just trendy — it's essential for survival in a complex world.

Tech pioneers like Facebook (now Meta) saw this early. Their original mantra — "Move fast and break things" — wasn’t just about speed; it was about trusting teams to act decisively without waiting for permission from above.

And it worked — for a time.

Small, empowered teams drove extraordinary early innovation. But Meta's story also reveals the dangers of unchecked decentralization. Without strong connective tissue — shared principles, clear guardrails, and systemic awareness — speed gave way to fragmentation. Teams raced in different directions, risk signals were missed, and major challenges (from product missteps to societal impact risks) grew unchecked.

The deeper lesson: Decentralization without connection is drift, not agility.

Today’s most successful organizations balance:

• Freedom with shared purpose
• Autonomy with strategic clarity
• Speed with systemic awareness

Empowerment works best when teams stay linked to something bigger than themselves. True complexity-busting isn’t just about running faster — it’s about running smarter, together.

‍

Teams of Teams: McChrystal’s Breakthrough

‍

General Stanley McChrystal experienced this firsthand leading U.S. Joint Special Operations Command.

Even highly skilled, empowered teams became ineffective when they operated in silos. His breakthrough was building a "team of teams" — interconnected groups sharing information openly, trusting each other deeply, and aligning around a common purpose.

McChrystal called it shared consciousness:

• Radical transparency
• Daily communication
• A deep, collective understanding of the mission

This allowed decentralized teams to act autonomously yet move cohesively, multiplying their impact.

In today’s organizations, the formula remains true: Individual team autonomy + organizational alignment = system-wide agility. Empowering teams isn’t enough. Connecting them is essential.

‍

Supporting Teams to Bust Complexity

‍

Strong teams that bust complexity don’t emerge by accident — they are built deliberately, patiently, and thoughtfully.

Key building blocks include:

• Shared Understanding: Teams need a clear, common model for collaboration and improvement. Without it, their attempts to simplify can ironically create more confusion.
  
  
• Good Guidance: Atlassian’s "mission maps" help teams constantly link daily actions back to strategic goals — providing a fast-moving but steadying compass.
  
  
• Clear Decision-Making: Borrowing from Google's "decision owner" practice, teams encourage inclusive discussion but maintain clarity about who decides — preventing analysis paralysis.
  
  
• Smarter Meetings: Amazon’s replacement of PowerPoint decks with short, written narratives keeps meetings focused, action-driven, and free of status-report bloat.
  
  
• Healthy Risk-Taking: Teams must distinguish between intelligent experimentation (which drives learning) and careless mistakes. Celebrate smart risks; swiftly address sloppiness.
  
  

When teams operate with clarity, autonomy, and confidence, they don’t just survive complexity — they simplify it.

‍

Busting Silos: Beyond the Team

‍

Strong teams don’t just strengthen themselves — they reach outward.

The UK’s Government Digital Service (GDS) provides a standout example: instead of building isolated units, they organized around service communities that connected people across departments. The focus was on user needs, not bureaucratic structures — fostering collaboration over siloed excellence.

The lesson? In complexity, collaboration across boundaries matters as much as collaboration within teams.

Strong teams continually look up and out — linking their efforts to the larger mission, evolving best practices, and keeping the organizational web healthy and resilient.

‍

Closing Reflection

‍

Oliver Wendell Holmes said it best: "I would not give a fig for the simplicity this side of complexity, but I would give my life for the simplicity on the other side of complexity."

Strong teams are the bridge to that better side.

Deliberate. Empowered. Connected. Resilient. When you build teams with these qualities, you don’t just manage complexity — you transform it into clarity, agility, and innovation.

Build Teams. Watch the Ripples Flow.

Full List Of References

‍

• ‍Project Management Institute (PMI), Heaslip, R. J. (2015). Managing Organizational Complexity: How to Optimize the Governance of Programs and Projects to Improve Decision Making. PMI White Paper.
  https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/managing-organizational-complexity-11139 
  ‍‍
• Cohen, M.D., March, J.G., & Olsen, J.P., A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1972.
  ‍https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235616360_A_Garbage_Can_Model_of_Organization_Choice
  ‍
• Garbage Can Model (Cohen, March, and Olsen, 1972) Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.
  https://doi.org/10.2307/2392088
  ‍
• Sensemaking Theory (Karl Weick) Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257397559_Sensemaking_in_organizations_by_Karl_E_Weick_Thousand_Oaks_CA_Sage_Publications_1995_231_pp 
  ‍
• Complexity Leadership Theory (Uhl-Bien et al.) Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. 
  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1048984307000689
  ‍
• Fast Company, Forget Icebreakers—This 5-Step Process Builds Real Team Trust, 2025.
  ‍https://www.fastcompany.com/91305576/forget-icebreakers-this-5-step-process-builds-real-team-trust?utm_medium=social&utm_source=linkedin
  ‍
• McChrystal Group, Building Trust in a Mistrusting World.
  ‍https://www.mcchrystalgroup.com/insights
  ‍
• UK Government Digital Service (GDS), Service Communities
  https://gds.blog.gov.uk/2022/12/20/government-digital-service-updates-on-our-2021-2024-strategy/
  ‍‍
• Yang, C. & Grenier, L., What Leads to Administrative Bloat? A Dynamic Model of Administrative Cost and Waste, 2024. 
  https://arxiv.org/html/2412.15378v1